Group 1_01 ----------- Informed consent form (1) : 1 Prototype quality (5) : 5 Report quality (2) : 2 Connection with design (2) : 2 Total (10) : 10 Group 1_02 ----------- Informed consent form (1) : 1 Prototype quality (5) : 5 Report quality (2) : 1 Connection with design (2) : 2 Total (10) : 9 Report is hard to navigate and could be improved. Group 1_03 ----------- Informed consent form (1) : 1 Prototype quality (5) : 5 Report quality (2) : 2 Connection with design (2) : 2 Total (10) : 10 Group 1_04 ----------- Informed consent form (1) : 1 Prototype quality (5) : 5 Report quality (2) : 2 Connection with design (2) : 2 Total (10) : 10 Two of the members of this group received lower grades as they didn't participate in the prototype implementation and presentation. Group 1_05 ----------- Informed consent form (1) : 1 Prototype quality (5) : 5 Report quality (2) : 1 Connection with design (2) : 1 Total (10) : 9 Group 2_01 ---------- Informed consent form (1) : 1 Prototype quality (5) : 5 Report quality (2) : 2 Connection with design (2) : 2 Total (10) : 10 Group 2_02 ---------- Informed consent form (1) : 1 Prototype quality (5) : 5 Report quality (2) : 2 Connection with design (2) : 2 Total (10) : 10 Group 2_03 ---------- Informed consent form (1) : 1 Prototype quality (5) : 5 Report quality (2) : 2 Connection with design (2) : 2 Total (10) : 10 Group 2_04 ---------- Informed consent form (1) : 1 Prototype quality (5) : 5 Report quality (2) : 2 Connection with design (2) : 2 Total (10) : 10 Group 2_05 ---------- Informed consent form (1) : 1 Prototype quality (5) : 4 Report quality (2) : 2 Connection with design (2) : 1 Total (10) : 8 The connection with the design document was not very explicit. The prototype was not as effective as it could be.